Beyond Horizon

Month

December 2010

3 posts

Flexibility vs Simplicity

As a product manager, you often face challenges in deciding when to keep things simple and when to add flexibility. Both are important in a product, and finding right balance is critical for a good user experience. Diverse business environment demands flexibility - product should be able to meet requirements of different customers, in different industries and different countries. But the flexibility makes product difficult to use for end user.  How to find the right balance?

I always try to categorize features in “end customer” and “backend” category. End customer feature are the ones that are going to be used by consumer of the product. I try to avoid flexibility as much as possible for those features. My goal in such cases is to get rid of any extra bells and whistle that customer is not going to use. I try to focus on the flow where consumer would spend 80% of their time and then simplify that flow as much as possible for the user.

On the other hand, I try to add maximum flexibility to backend features. Backend features are the ones that are not visible to end customer but critical for integration of the product in different environments. For instance, billing and product configuration features. I try to cast the net as wide as possible for such features and try to cover all different scenarios that product will be used in. My goal for such features is to add as much flexibility as possible to cover wide range of configuration and customer requirements. Spending precious engineering resources on such features often doesn’t have a direct impact on ROI, and therefore it helps a lot if you can integrate your product in different environment without doing too much of custom integration development.

Dec 25, 2010
#Product Management
Professors, Consultants or Practitioners

I have come across many books and internet articles written by business consultants, practitioners and B-School professors. There is a distinctive quality and style that you can observe among all three. I don’t know how to describe it but I can feel it while reading..

I enjoy reading practitioners most though…

Which one do you enjoy more?

Dec 20, 2010
2000 or 2010?

Are we in 2010 or 2000? Current hyperactivity in web world reminds me of 2000 dot com bubble and subsequent burst. New start-ups are taking birth every minute and investor money is flowing crazy. Valuations are going through roofs (remember $6 billion offer that Groupon REJECTED!!). This time boom is driven by social networking craze, largely driven by spectacular success of Twitter & Facebook. I am no crystal gazer to tell whether this boom is going to bust the way it happened in 2000 but some of the ideas that are making news looks really crazy to me:

1) Hashable: Hashable let you make an intro between two people over Twitter.

Now can someone tell me why do I need another application for that? And why do I want to make an intro on Twitter? Hashable raised $4 million in series A funding

2) Eons: “Boom, Boom, Boom”. Eons is online community for baby boomers. Those who are born between 1946 and 1964.

Why do Baby boomers need a separate social networking site? Why not Facebook?? Eons is funded by General Catalyst Partners, Sequoia Capital, Charles River Ventures and Intel Capital, as well as Humana, Inc

3) CitySocialising: CitySocialising, the subscription-based social network that lets members find local and likeminded people to socialize with in the real world.

Yawn!! Yet another social networking site. CitySocialising raised around $ 2 million

4) Threadsy: threadsy is integrated communication client. It combines email, Facebook, Twitter, and other social web into a single client.

I get hundred of e-mails, and Facebook / Twitter updates every day. It would drive me nuts if all of these start landing in a single client. Raised more than $6 million

5) Twinterest: A tool that creates an interest graph – a list of things you probably love – based only on looking at your twitter stream.

Now I need Twitter to know what I love.

6) Yammer: A social networking site for office colleagues.

Funded by Charles River Ventures, Founders Fund, Emergence Capital. Well…

I sincerely hope that I am the only one who thinks that some of these ideas don’t make sense. I sincerely hope that we don’t see repeat of 2000 tech industry crash!!

Dec 19, 2010
Next page →
2011 2012
  • January 1
  • February 3
  • March 2
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October 1
  • November
  • December
2010 2011 2012
  • January 3
  • February 3
  • March 1
  • April 3
  • May 1
  • June 1
  • July 4
  • August 2
  • September 1
  • October
  • November 1
  • December
2010 2011
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May 2
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December 3